Humanity has wiped out 60% of animals since 1970, major report finds

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-WAbki57E55c/W9fOVaT4lXI/AAAAAAAAA5Y/JGmwyzwc-VUwS-cd-0Bk-VL3-hw_lel6wCK4BGAYYCw/s1600/2018-10-30_8-51-22.jpg

Humanity has wiped out 60% of animals since 1970, major report finds




Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “Humanity has wiped out 60% of animals since 1970, major report finds” was written by Damian Carrington, for The Guardian on Tuesday 30th October 2018 00.01 UTC


Humanity has wiped out 60% of mammals, birds, fish and reptiles since 1970, leading the world’s foremost experts to warn that the annihilation of wildlife is now an emergency that threatens civilisation.


The new estimate of the massacre of wildlife is made in a major report produced by WWF and involving 59 scientists from across the globe. It finds that the vast and growing consumption of food and resources by the global population is destroying the web of life, billions of years in the making, upon which human society ultimately depends for clean air, water and everything else.


“We are sleepwalking towards the edge of a cliff” said Mike Barrett, executive director of science and conservation at WWF. “If there was a 60% decline in the human population, that would be equivalent to emptying North America, South America, Africa, Europe, China and Oceania. That is the scale of what we have done.”


“This is far more than just being about losing the wonders of nature, desperately sad though that is,” he said. “This is actually now jeopardising the future of people. Nature is not a ‘nice to have’ – it is our life-support system.”


interactive

“We are rapidly running out of time,” said Prof Johan Rockström, a global sustainability expert at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany. “Only by addressing both ecosystems and climate do we stand a chance of safeguarding a stable planet for humanity’s future on Earth.”


Many scientists believe the world has begun a sixth mass extinction, the first to be caused by a species – Homo sapiens. Other recent analyses have revealed that humankind has destroyed 83% of all mammals and half of plants since the dawn of civilisation and that, even if the destruction were to end now, it would take 5-7 million years for the natural world to recover.


The Living Planet Index, produced for WWF by the Zoological Society of London, uses data on 16,704 populations of mammals, birds, fish, reptiles and amphibians, representing more than 4,000 species, to track the decline of wildlife. Between 1970 and 2014, the latest data available, populations fell by an average of 60%. Four years ago, the decline was 52%. The “shocking truth”, said Barrett, is that the wildlife crash is continuing unabated.


Wildlife and the ecosystems are vital to human life, said Prof Bob Watson, one of the world’s most eminent environmental scientists and currently chair of an intergovernmental panel on biodiversity that said in March that the destruction of nature is as dangerous as climate change.


“Nature contributes to human wellbeing culturally and spiritually, as well as through the critical production of food, clean water, and energy, and through regulating the Earth’s climate, pollution, pollination and floods,” he said. “The Living Planet report clearly demonstrates that human activities are destroying nature at an unacceptable rate, threatening the wellbeing of current and future generations.”


The biggest cause of wildlife losses is the destruction of natural habitats, much of it to create farmland. Three-quarters of all land on Earth is now significantly affected by human activities. Killing for food is the next biggest cause – 300 mammal species are being eaten into extinction – while the oceans are massively overfished, with more than half now being industrially fished.




African elephants: With 55 being poached for ivory every day, more are being poached than are being born, meaning populations are plunging


Orangutans: More than 100,000 were lost in Borneo alone between 1999 and 2015, largely due to forest destruction for timber and palm oil, leaving the great apes critically endangered


Whale sharks: Numbers of the largest fish have collapsed by two thirds in the last 75 years in the Indian and-Pacific Oceans, due to overfishing and ship collisions.


Wandering albatross: Populations are declining rapidly, driven largely by accidental catches in long line fisheries. One monitored population on South Georgia fell by half between 1972 and 2010


Jaguar: The razing of forests in South America is driving the decline of this big cat, which prefers to live in dense jungle


Gharials: There are now just 200 breeding adults of the fish-eating crocodile in the wild in India and Nepal, the result of rampant fishing, poaching and drops in river flow.


Chinese giant salamander: This creature is one of 545 critically endangered amphibians, decimated by hunting for food, destruction of rivers and lakes and pollution.


Hedgehog: This animal is among the fifth of UK mammals at high risk of extinction, with populations having fallen hugely in both urban and rural locations.




 

Chemical pollution is also significant: half the world’s killer whale populations are now doomed to die from PCB contamination. Global trade introduces invasive species and disease, with amphibians decimated by a fungal disease thought to be spread by the pet trade.


The worst affected region is South and Central America, which has seen an 89% drop in vertebrate populations, largely driven by the felling of vast areas of wildlife-rich forest. In the tropical savannah called cerrado, an area the size of Greater London is cleared every two months, said Barrett.


“It is a classic example of where the disappearance is the result of our own consumption, because the deforestation is being driven by ever expanding agriculture producing soy, which is being exported to countries including the UK to feed pigs and chickens,” he said. The UK itself has lost much of its wildlife, ranking 189th for biodiversity loss out of 218 nations in 2016.


The habitats suffering the greatest damage are rivers and lakes, where wildlife populations have fallen 83%, due to the enormous thirst of agriculture and the large number of dams. “Again there is this direct link between the food system and the depletion of wildlife,” said Barrett. Eating less meat is an essential part of reversing losses, he said.


The Living Planet Index has been criticised as being too broad a measure of wildlife losses and smoothing over crucial details. But all indicators, from extinction rates to intactness of ecosystems, show colossal losses. “They all tell you the same story,” said Barrett.


Conservation efforts can work, with tiger numbers having risen 20% in India in six years as habitat is protected. Giant pandas in China and otters in the UK have also been doing well.


But Marco Lambertini, director general of WWF International, said the fundamental issue was consumption: “We can no longer ignore the impact of current unsustainable production models and wasteful lifestyles.”


The world’s nations are working towards a crunch meeting of the UN’s Convention on Biological Diversity in 2020, when new commitments for the protection of nature will be made. “We need a new global deal for nature and people and we have this narrow window of less than two years to get it,” said Barrett. “This really is the last chance. We have to get it right this time.”


Tanya Steele, chief executive at WWF, said: “We are the first generation to know we are destroying our planet and the last one that can do anything about it.”


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010


Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.




Humanity has wiped out 60% of animals since 1970, major report findshttps://is.gd/HmXq1s

Lion Air crash: Indonesian authorities search underwater for bodies and plane

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-107To0xD4Zg/W9fLp6mZGlI/AAAAAAAAA4o/Zn_hEIBKAYUNpEbgax6ED21mt4zuEeMSACK4BGAYYCw/s1600/2018-10-30_8-38-14.jpg

Lion Air crash: Indonesian authorities search underwater for bodies and plane




Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “Lion Air crash: Indonesian authorities search underwater for bodies and plane” was written by Kate Lamb in Jakarta, Michael Safi in Delhi and Kate Lyons, for theguardian.com on Tuesday 30th October 2018 01.36 UTC


A round-the-clock search is underway for the bodies of the 189 passengers onboard Lion Air flight JT 610, which crashed into the sea off Jakarta on Monday morning.


Human remains were recovered from the crash site, about 15km (9 miles) off the coast, but authorities said they were now focusing the search underwater. They do not expect to find survivors.


The passenger plane, flying from Jakarta to an Indonesian tin-mining region, lost contact with air traffic control about 13 minutes after take off on Monday morning, shortly after its pilot had asked to return to base. Flight data showed that it made a sudden, sharp dive into the sea. The cause of the crash is unknown.


Rescuers have released footage of debris and personal items floating in the water at the crash site, including handbags, clothing, mobile phones, ID cards and driving licences.


The head of Basarnas, the national search and rescue agency, Muhammad Syauqi, said that no human remains had been found since 11am on Monday. As a result an underwater search had begun, involving 30 specialised divers, according to the Jakarta Post.


Lion Air 610 plane crash map

Lion Air has flown 169 family members of those on board JT610 to Jakarta to help with identifying the remains.


The plane went down in waters about 30-35 metres (98-115ft) deep and divers were searching areas they believe the plane might be, based on wind and current patterns. The search is due to last for seven days, with an additional three days if the plane has not been found.


Families of those onboard waited anxiously for news at Soekarno-Hatta airport in Jakarta. Forensics officers asked them to assist with identification by providing medical and dental records at the police hospital in East Jakarta.



 

One of those onboard was Bhavye Suneja, who lived in Jakarta with his wife of two years. The rest of his family live in Delhi.


Kapish Gandhi, Suneja’s cousin, said the family was devastated by the news and had gathered together in Delhi. “We saw it on the television this morning and didn’t know whether to believe it,” Gandhi said. “We are all speechless.”


Gandhi described Suneja as someone who loved his work. “He was very much interested in it,” he said.


As relatives waited for news, they were warned about false images purporting to be of passengers onboard were being circulated online.


A wallet belonging to a victim of the Lion Air passenger jet that crashed floats in the waters of Ujung Karawang
A wallet belonging to a victim of the Lion Air passenger jet that crashed off Jakarta.
Photograph: Achmad Ibrahim/AP

Sutopo Purwo Nugroho, the spokesman for Indonesia’s disaster relief agency, published examples of misleading Twitter posts, including an image of a fuselage of a Lion Air plane lying in the sea. Nugroho said it was being shared as an image of the JT610 flight, but this was a “hoax”.


“This is a photo of the wreck of the aircraft of Lion Air JT904”, which crashed into water in Bali in 2013. All onboard survived the incident.


The JT610 plane that crashed off Jakarta was a Boeing 737 Max 8 jet, a new model that was launched globally last year. The plane had been in use for less than three months.


Lion Air’s chief executive, Edward Sirait, told reporters the plane had suffered “a technical issue” on Sunday night but engineers had cleared it to fly on Monday morning.


“This plane previously flew from Denpasar to Jakarta,” he said. “There was a report of a technical issue, which had been resolved according to procedure.”


Sirait did not elaborate on the issue and said he had no plans to ground the rest of Lion Air’s Max 8 fleet. The airline operates 11 of the Boeing planes. The Boeing Company released a statement saying it was “deeply saddened” by the news and extended “heartfelt sympathies to the families and loved ones of those on board”. The company further said it was providing technical assistance at the request and under the direction of government authorities investigating the accident.


An official from AirNav Indonesia has said the JT610 pilot asked to turn back only two to three minutes after taking off from Soekarno Hatta airport.


“We received the request from the pilot to return to base. The air traffic controller gave permission to return, and there is a recording of it,” said AirNav president director Novie Riyanto in a press conference at Soekarno-Hatta International Airport in Tangerang, Banten.


The crash has renewed concerns about the safety of Indonesian airlines, soon after US and European regulators removed prohibitions against them.


The United States and the European Union had banned Indonesian aircraft from their skies in 2007 after a string of accidents. The Federal Aviation Administration lifted that ban in August 2016.


In June, European regulators, who had already allowed Lion Air and a few other Indonesian carriers to resume flying to Europe, lifted their ban on remaining Indonesian carriers.


A spokesman said the European Commission had no immediate plans to renew the ban on Lion Air, but the Australian government warned its officials and contractors not to fly on Lion Air pending findings from the crash investigation.


Additional reporting by Kakoli Bhattacharya


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010


Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.




Lion Air crash: Indonesian authorities search underwater for bodies and planehttps://is.gd/rEtoZa

British Airways: 185,000 more passengers may have had details stolen

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-KkV8qe_lprQ/W9KISlx_tdI/AAAAAAAAA34/2aeYmFE1h44VcnB7SlOEW_N_IJmwO4oVwCK4BGAYYCw/s1600/2018-10-26_8-50-48.jpg

British Airways: 185,000 more passengers may have had details stolen




Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “British Airways: 185,000 more passengers may have had details stolen” was written by Jasper Jolly, for The Guardian on Thursday 25th October 2018 16.49 UTC


British Airways has revealed that another 185,000 customers may have had personal details stolen in a data breach.


Customers who made reward bookings using a payment card between 21 April and 28 July this year may be at risk, British Airways owner International Airlines Group (IAG) said in a statement to the stock market.


British Airways revealed last month that it had identified 380,000 payment cards at risk, although on Thursday it downgraded its estimate to 244,000 affected.


On top of that, hackers may have stolen names, addresses, email addresses, card numbers, expiry dates, and card verification value (CVV) numbers for another 77,000 customers, British Airways said, potentially allowing purchases to be made.


Another 108,000 may have had details stolen not including the CVV, the three-digit code which acts as an extra layer of protection for online transactions.


British Airways planes on the runway at Heathrow airport in London.
British Airways planes on the runway at Heathrow airport in London. Photograph: Neil Hall/Reuters

All affected customers will be contacted via email before 5pm on Friday, a spokesperson for British Airways said.


The spokesperson said the airline was unable to confirm details of how the data breach occurred, in order to avoid compromising the police investigation.


IAG said it does not have “conclusive evidence” that any data has been removed from its systems, but advised customers to contact their bank or card provider “as a precaution”.


British Airways has been “working continuously with specialist cyber forensic investigators and the National Crime Agency to investigate fully the data theft”, IAG added.


However, British Airways said it has not yet received any verified reports of fraud in relation to the data breach.


Alex Cruz, chairman and chief executive of British Airways, previously pledged to compensate any customers who suffer “financial hardship” because of the breach.


He said the firm was “deeply sorry”, saying he takes “the protection of our customers’ data very seriously” when the possible theft was first announced in September.


The breach marked the latest in a series of major computer issues for British Airways, after a systems outage in May 2017 forced it to cancel all flights for a day from London’s Heathrow and Gatwick airports.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010


Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.




British Airways: 185,000 more passengers may have had details stolenhttps://is.gd/gXH80k

Could this be the magic bullet to avoid winter flu?

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-kpVaU4dHJ_c/W9KGs7U8noI/AAAAAAAAA3I/-o44qQGy-lIZ0x9bMTnGcHmQ3yxf-9S9ACK4BGAYYCw/s1600/2018-10-26_8-44-02.jpg

Could this be the magic bullet to avoid winter flu?




Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “Could this be the magic bullet to avoid winter flu?” was written by Emma Brockes, for The Guardian on Thursday 25th October 2018 17.34 UTC


Every year at the start of winter I type the same thing into Google, and every year fixate on at least one result that will save me. The question – how not to get sick – generates the same basic answers each year, but still the promise of a magic bullet lingers on. Last year, it was hand sanitiser. If I could distribute travel-size dispensers into every jacket pocket I possessed, no germs would dare to come near me. (They did.)


Windows were a thing one year; fresh air would do the trick. (It didn’t.) I’ve never gone as far as the Sars mask, but I have definitely gone through mad phases of not holding the pole in the subway.


The real answer, I know, is to eat and sleep better; but this seems unachievable, or at least deeply uninteresting without some programmatic element with grander marketing promises to make me immortal. And so this year, after everyone in my household promptly got sick three days into autumn and has been engaged in a relay race of infections ever since, it’s meal prep. If I can make my fridge look like a trolley on an airplane, we will hack this cold season and emerge fighting fit in the spring.


In this, at least, I am helped by the food preparation services of New York, which have proliferated in the last few years so that any requirement can be met and delivered to your door. If you’re on a blockbuster diet – Paleo, say, or the Whole30 – there is a company that will deliver those meals every day. There is a new company devoted to “fitness” meal plans, which seems to involve the same combination of protein, carb and fibre as its competitors, with the exception that every meal comes with a jaunty fitness-inspired name: “bodybuilder’s essential white rice”, for example, or “athlete chicken teriyaki”.


Actually, I tried that last one this week and the chicken did look like it had done a hard workout. The homespun version of all this is meal-prep Sunday, a movement on Instagram and elsewhere in which people post photos of a week’s worth of meals they have prepared on Sunday night. It is supposed to encourage, but something about the image of seven salads in mason jars or a week’s worth of neatly deconstructed chilli bowls fills me with despair.


The difficulty is primarily one of scale. Left to my own devices I will eat any old crust I can find lying around, and seem to have existed for three years solely on leftover fish fingers, so clearly there is work to be done. But the outsourcing impulse, or the adoption of radical new habits, is a piece of avoidance that ends up like all other grand schemes – in the bin.


The sensible thing, I know, is simply to shop better, which doesn’t mean panic-buying 75 kiwis and, over the course of two weeks, watching them slowly disintegrate on top of the microwave. Still, it is hard to let go of the idea there is something better out there, something bolder and more definitive in its results.


And so I go back to the internet. “Avoid contact with people who are sick,” seems to be the main headline on more than one health website, which in my case would mean moving to a separate house from my children. After another night of coughing, I think I have finally found the answer.


• Emma Brockes is a Guardian columnist


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010


Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.




Could this be the magic bullet to avoid winter flu?https://is.gd/yE49QD

Flash flood in Jordan sweeps away school bus, killing at least 18

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-1BiViTfixZ0/W9KD6d7A1TI/AAAAAAAAA2Q/R4X2VS9oehs6p-UKPwfQSIGZ4j6g0RdcACK4BGAYYCw/s1600/2018-10-26_8-31-44.jpg

Flash flood in Jordan sweeps away school bus, killing at least 18




Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “Flash flood in Jordan sweeps away school bus, killing at least 18” was written by Oliver Holmes in Jerusalem, for The Guardian on Thursday 25th October 2018 19.12 UTC


At least 18 people, most of them children, have been killed after raging floodwaters swept away a school bus near the Dead Sea.


Jordan launched a major operation on Thursday to search for survivors involving army divers, and neighbouring Israel said it was assisting with search-and-rescue helicopters.


Search teams had rescued 34 people, some of whom were in a serious condition, Jordanian civil defence sources said. The bus had been carrying about 40 children and their teachers.


Many of those killed were children under 14. A number of families picnicking in the popular destination were also among the dead and injured, rescuers said, without giving a breakdown of numbers.


Hospitals in the area were put on high alert. A civil defence official was quoted on state television as saying that the number of casualties was expected to rise.


Israel’s police and military said their forces were sent at the request of the Jordanian government. “The soldiers … are assisting in locating the missing in spite of the adverse weather conditions,” the Israeli Defence Forces said.


The region was bracing on Thursday for the first winter storms after the summer, with heavy rainfall and high winds expected.


In a separate incident a four-year-old was killed in southern Israel when he was swept away by flooding, local media reported.


In April, nine Israeli teenagers hiking south of the Dead Sea were killed in a similar flood. The arid region, the world’s lowest point at about 1,400ft (430m) below sea level, is often hit by flash floods.


They occur when heavy rains hit higher ground, even while the local area is dry, with torrents rushing down steep cliffs and cutting across roads.


Reuters contributed to this report


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010


Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.




Flash flood in Jordan sweeps away school bus, killing at least 18https://is.gd/B9O5ud

Alphabet reports $33.7bn in revenue as sexual misconduct claims engulf Google

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-2x7xdxBU36I/W9KCQXSPPOI/AAAAAAAAA1c/HHQigbpB31Q4PpOcrWPbNAHlEVJRvv00QCK4BGAYYCw/s1600/2018-10-26_8-25-10.jpg

Alphabet reports $33.7bn in revenue as sexual misconduct claims engulf Google




Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “Alphabet reports $33.7bn in revenue as sexual misconduct claims engulf Google” was written by Gabrielle Canon in San Francisco, for theguardian.com on Thursday 25th October 2018 22.43 UTC


On the day Google was engulfed by concerns about its handling of sexual misconduct allegations, Alphabet, it’s parent company, announced third quarter earnings of $33.7bn.


The results fulfilled predictions for continued growth despite controversy over a recent data breach on the company’s social network, Google+.


Ruth Porat, the Chief Financial Officer said the revenue growth was up 21% from the same period last year and reported profit of $8.3bn, with good performances from Youtube, Cloud, and both desktop and mobile search.


The results came as the New York Times reported that Google gave former executive Andy Rubin a severance package of $90m, but concealed details of a sexual misconduct allegation that triggered his departure.


The company’s CEO, Sundar Pichai, sent a letter to staff on Thursday after the New York Times article was published, insisting that the company took a “hard line” in sexual misconduct allegations, revealing that 48 people including 13 senior managers had been fired in the past two years.


However, the issue was not mentioned in the earnings call . Critics have called for an increase in government oversight and regulations over tech companies, and for a crackdown on the monopolies they hold.


“It is exciting to think that 20 years in we are still at the beginning of what’s possible,” Pichai said during the call, outlining the areas that helped the company have a strong quarter.


He detailed the ways Google hardware devices, continued development core products like search and map, and the Cloud, helped the company continue to grow. He also said they were seeing positive traction on subscription services, and were prioritizing Google News to ensure “credible news sources” are prominently surfaced.


Sign up for the new US morning briefing

More than 70% of Alphabet’s revenues come from Google Properties, and analysts had predicted the tech giant was heading into the third quarter on a positive note, even after controversy over a data breach spurred the shutdown of Google’s already-underperforming social network, Google+.


Earlier this month Google was ranked in the top two most valuable brands by Interbrand, a global brand consultancy that releases an annual report, based on its relevance, responsiveness, and presence. Google was valued in the report at $155bn , and has been in the top three for the past six years, showing considerable continued growth.


But in early October, the Wall Street Journal exposed that third-party developers were able to access information from roughly 500,000 accounts, and that Google executives had known about the bug in its API (application program interface) since early spring.


In a blog post published in response to the story, the company said that the developers were not aware of the bug and that they found no evidence that profile data was misused, but announced it would still shut down Google+ while it worked on strengthening data protections.


“Given these challenges and the very low usage of the consumer version of Google+, we decided to sunset the consumer version of Google+,” Google’s Ben Smith wrote, adding that the consumer side of the social platform would be phased out slowly over the next ten months.


Scott Galloway, a professor at NYU’s Stern School of Business, said it should come as no surprise that the move didn’t turn into a financial setback this quarter, especially considering how poorly Google+ was performing.


“They were looking for an excuse to shut it down,” he says. “To connect this problem to shutting the platform down was disingenuous.”


Galloway emphasized that, even if the data breach fueled controversy and concerns from consumers, it did nothing to affect the financial outlook. “These scandals have created a lot of headlines, but they haven’t impacted business performance,” he said, explaining that government intervention is the only thing that could slow Alphabet down.


“The risk to shareholders is that the specter of regulation, which at some point becomes increasingly realistic given how often these companies are blowing up on themselves,” he added.


“Monopolistic internet platforms like Google and Facebook are probably ‘too big to secure’ and are certainly ‘too big to trust’ blindly,” Jeff Hauser, from the Centre for Economic Policy Research told The Guardian after the data breach was revealed earlier this month, adding that the US Federal Trade Commission should break the platforms up.


In a move analysts called an attempt to advocate for regulations on their own terms, Pichai joined Apple’s chairman, Tim Cook, to voice support for increased oversight from the government on protecting privacy, at an international conference in Brussels this month.


Pichai insisted on Thursday that Google had “always approached our products with a strong privacy lens for our users”.


States across the US are already making moves to pass regulatory laws, following sweeping legislation in the European Union. In June, California passed its own a digital privacy law, spurring tech company lobbyists to begin advocating the federal government to draft more favorable rules.


Still, Alphabet has shown it is strong enough to withstand big regulatory hits. During the last quarter, which closed in June, Alphabet reported that its profits dipped after an unprecedented $5bn fine from the European Union. The company still defied expectations, with revenue at $32.6bn in revenue and profit of $2.8bn. The upward trend is likely to continue experts say, unless even bigger moves are made by the regulatory agencies.


“From an investor’s standpoint, you are stupid not to own these stocks,” Galloway said. “This company has incredible earnings power – because it is awesome to be a monopoly in a growing economy. The only thing standing between Google and continued growth is the government.”


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010


Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.




Alphabet reports $33.7bn in revenue as sexual misconduct claims engulf Googlehttps://is.gd/r4E68Y

Indonesians fight for more 'smelly money' to bear life near Jakarta's landfill mountain

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-JNzo7rp_vvM/W9J_DokEVdI/AAAAAAAAA0s/EgaxxAqNfR4OgN9RMf_CDh9y66xpqnXqwCK4BGAYYCw/s1600/2018-10-26_8-11-20.jpg

Indonesians fight for more 'smelly money' to bear life near Jakarta's landfill mountain




Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “Indonesians fight for more ‘smelly money’ to bear life near Jakarta’s landfill mountain” was written by Kate Lamb in Jakarta, for theguardian.com on Thursday 25th October 2018 23.37 UTC


Indonesians living around one of the largest landfills in south-east Asia have called on the government to increase their compensation for tolerating the dump’s nauseating and notorious stink.


An hour’s drive from the sprawling Indonesian capital, much of the waste from Jakarta’s 10 million residents ends up in ever-growing mountains of trash that make up the Bantar Gebang landfill. It is the largest tip in the country, covering 110 hectares.


Atop the fetid mounds of waste, thousands eke out a living as rubbish pickers, spending their days with cane baskets on their backs, combing the landfill for plastic and rubbish to recycle or resell.


Dubbed “the mountain” by some locals, the foul smell from the tip is intense – even residents who live 10km away complain.


Residents receive 200,000 Indonesian rupiah ($13) a month as compensation for living with the stench, but now they are calling for more.


“It’s not enough, it needs to be increased,” one resident, Somad, told Kompas.com, “Because of the smell of the garbage I have to spend more, not to mention my children. Sometimes they don’t want to be at home because of the smell, and they want to play [outside].”


Residents say they have to buy gallons of water, for drinking, cooking and showering, because the local water is too polluted.


An estimated 18,000 families live in three villages around the waste site, with at least 6,000 of them working as trash pickers.


Known locally as “uang bau”, which translates as “smelly money”, some local councillors agree it is time the compensation was increased.


Aerial view of the Bantar Gebang landfill site.
Aerial view of the Bantar Gebang landfill site. Photograph: Santirta Martendano/AFP/Getty Images

“I pity the residents there [in Bantar Gebang] because Jakarta is not committed to reducing the amount of trash it sends [to the site]. This is about the health of the locals and it is only valued at 200,000 rupiah per month,” said council member Ariyanto Hendrata.


Bantar Gebang had long attracted criticism for its smell and unsanitary conditions, as well as for keeping Jakarta’s waste problems out of sight and mind.


With recycling virtually non-existent in Jakarta, much of the capital’s plastic waste ends up in Bantar Gebang, burned in toxic piles, or dumped into rivers. Indonesia is now the world’s second-biggest ocean plastic polluter after China.


But the problem is also chronic on land.


Hundreds of trucks travel from Jakarta to Bantar Gebang, on the outskirts of Bekasi city in West Java, dumping an estimated 7,000 tons of waste a day.


Bekasi’s mayor, Rahmat Effendi, who says Bantar Gebang now contains 300,000 cubic metres of waste, is scheduled to meet the Jakarta government to discuss “uang bau” and environmental hazards this week.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010


Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.




Indonesians fight for more 'smelly money' to bear life near Jakarta's landfill mountainhttps://is.gd/HVvwpH

One in three New Zealanders drink dangerously through their entire lives – study

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-BQSonqi0ct4/W9J4SJF51bI/AAAAAAAAAz8/2h9DrwvaLjg5Ye7PXr1oVT-OKDXKZRcLwCK4BGAYYCw/s1600/2018-10-26_7-35-41.jpg

One in three New Zealanders drink dangerously through their entire lives – study




Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “One in three New Zealanders drink dangerously through their entire lives – study” was written by Eleanor Ainge Roy in Dunedin, for theguardian.com on Friday 26th October 2018 01.16 UTC


One third of New Zealanders are drinking alcohol at hazardous levels for their entire lives, a new report has found, challenging the myth that dangerous drinking habits are usually outgrown after people leave their party years.


The study was conducted by Massey University’s School of Health Sciences and the University of Auckland’s Centre for Addiction Research, and disputes that hazardous drinking is a phase, usually associated with people’s teens and early twenties.


It found 33% of New Zealanders who were “hazardous drinkers” by their 20s continued dangerous drinking patterns for most of their adult lives.


Transitioning between hazardous and non hazardous drinking patterns was uncommon, the report found, with drinking habits, once established, largely becoming a “stable trait”.


“The idea that younger drinkers will eventually ‘mature’ out of risky drinking when they get older is wrong,” said research co-leader Dr Andy Towers.


“Our results suggest that, for the most part, we have quite stable drinking patterns across the lifespan – if you’re a hazardous drinker in your 20s then you are likely to be a hazardous drinker in your 60s.”


Hazardous drinking is established by a quantity or pattern of alcohol consumption that puts drinkers at risk of immediate harm (such as blackouts or hospitalisation) or long-term health issues.


The research drew on information provided by a longitudinal study of 800 subjects aged 50 plus, and allowed researchers to drill into intimate details of people’s lives that could have influenced their later drinking patterns including their home life as children, work history, health and relationships .


Risk factors identified by the study for becoming a heavy drinker included being male, starting drinking young, growing up in a poor household and having a parent who was a heavy drinker.


New Zealand has earned a reputation as a binge-drinking nation. A third of all police incidents in the country involve alcohol and on the weekends 60-70% of all emergency room admissions are related to alcohol.


“If our results indicate that drinking patterns don’t change much across our lives, then we need to ensure young Kiwis don’t start drinking like this in the first place.” said Dr Towers.


“This means using approaches that we know help to reduce rates of drinking and harms, such as increasing the price of cheap alcohol, reducing alcohol accessibility and advertising, and banning alcohol sponsorship of sports that children play.”


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010


Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.




One in three New Zealanders drink dangerously through their entire lives – studyhttps://is.gd/v5jG7g

'Yawn cams' and heart monitors: five key facts about the world's longest sea bridge

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Wy1YfthkB9M/W86TShzS7OI/AAAAAAAAAzI/0rX3rPWY2EgoDXd39qqvYmcpZeN5JNeWQCK4BGAYYCw/s1600/2018-10-23_8-48-05.jpg

'Yawn cams' and heart monitors: five key facts about the world's longest sea bridge




Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “‘Yawn cams’ and heart monitors: five key facts about the world’s longest sea bridge” was written by Kate Lyons, for theguardian.com on Tuesday 23rd October 2018 03.12 UTC


The world’s longest sea bridge, connecting Hong Kong and Macau to the Chinese mainland has been officially opened, in a ceremony in Zhuhai attended by Chinese president Xi Jinping and Hong Kong’s chief executive, Carrie Lam.


In a short address Xi declared the bridge open, as digital fireworks exploded on a screen behind him. The bridge will open to traffic on Wednesday.


As well as being the longest bridge of its type, stretching 55km, the $20bn Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macau bridge is also one of the world’s most unusual roadways, with cameras to detect yawning, drivers forced to wear heart monitors and access restricted to the political elite and charity donors. Here are five things you need to know about the crossing:


‘Yawn cams’ and blood pressure checks


As drivers cross the bridge their heart rate and blood pressure will be monitored. The information will be sent to the bridge’s control centre. Hong Kong media have also reported there will be cameras monitoring drivers as they cross the bridge. If a driver yawns more than three times in 20 seconds, the “yawn cam” will raise an alert.


Special permits


Though the bridge aims to bring the autonomous regions of Hong Kong and Macau closer to mainland China, it will be accessible only to a select few.


People from Hong Kong will need special permits to drive across the bridge. There are reports that long-term permits to cross from Hong Kong to Zhuhai will be granted to people who meet strict criteria, such as paying significant taxes in China, donating large amounts of money to charities in the southern Chinese province of Guangdong, or those who are members of one of several political organisations. Others can take a private shuttle bus. There is no public transport on the bridge.


Controversy


Online commenters in Hong Kong have complained about the bridge’s restricted access. “Such a huge investment using the Hong Kong taxpayer’s money… yet basically it is not open to us at all,” said one comment on the South China Morning Post website.


A policeman and his dog patrol at the immigration building for the China-Zhuhai-Macau-Hong Kong Bridge ahead of the opening ceremony in Zhuhai
A policeman and his dog patrol at the immigration building for the China-Zhuhai-Macau-Hong Kong Bridge ahead of the opening ceremony in Zhuhai Photograph: Andy Wong/AP

Pro-democracy lawmaker Eddie Chu described the bridge as a “politically driven mega-project without urgent need.” Another bridge is being built between nearby Shenzhen and Zhongshan, just north of Zhuhai, meaning that by 2030 traffic is predicted to drop significantly on the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macau bridge. “Basically it is redundant,” he said.


Which side?


In Hong Kong and Macau, drivers travel on the left, in mainland China, drivers travel on the right, presenting a bit of a conundrum for the bridge.


Since the bridge is considered mainland Chinese territory, drivers will have to travel on the right for the length of the crossing, and Hong Kong drivers will also have to “comply with the laws and regulations of the mainland” while on it, according to the city’s transport department.


While creative solutions were put forward about how to handle the side swap, including a “flipper bridge” called the Pearl River Necklace proposed by a team of Dutch architects, a less exciting approach was chosen in the end, with cars stopping and changing sides at a specially built merge point before they drive onto the bridge in Hong Kong.


Bridge politics


The bridge is part of a campaign to connect Hong Kong and Macau to 11 Chinese cities to form a high-tech region to rival Silicon Valley, the Greater Bay Area. It is also the second major infrastructure project tying Hong Kong to mainland China to launch in a matter of weeks after the opening of a high-speed rail link last month.


Critics say the multi-billion dollar bridge is an attempt to integrate Hong Kong into China as fears grow that the city’s cherished freedoms are being eroded. Both Hong Kong and Macau are part of China, but are special administrative regions, which have their own governments, legal systems, and policies. There are concerns this bridge is a sign of Beijing’s desire to bring the regions more firmly under its control.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010


Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.




'Yawn cams' and heart monitors: five key facts about the world's longest sea bridgehttps://is.gd/fOAVH7

A local’s guide to Durban, South Africa: 10 top tips

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-m6yqZIBNjdQ/W86OT6FbhKI/AAAAAAAAAyQ/Ts6710g5Ra4AmlcfrfbUfHzIxP1PCtvugCK4BGAYYCw/s1600/2018-10-23_8-27-24.jpg

A local’s guide to Durban, South Africa: 10 top tips




Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “A local’s guide to Durban, South Africa: 10 top tips” was written by Kenny Naidoo, Durban-based journalist. Interview by Kevin Rushby, for The Guardian on Monday 22nd October 2018 05.30 UTC


Beachfront


Durban has always been a beach town, but the promenade has never been more vibrant, with street performers, sand sculptures, stalls and paddling pools. The front has a growing number of restaurants: the Joint is the latest, with local-style meat dishes and beers plus an upstairs bar with sea views; Afro’s Chicken Shop, in a bright yellow former shipping container, does chicken burgers and tjips (chips); and California Dreaming has a deck for dolphin spotting and serves bunny chow. uShaka Marine World has two good restaurants: Wahooz on the promenade, with free Sunday music sessions, and Cargo Hold, where sharks swim past the tables. Early in the morning, everyone is out paddleboarding, kayaking, cycling, jogging and surfing – there are kit hire shops, and two free open-air gyms.


Main street


Florida Road dining and shopping area.
In the pink … Florida Road dining and shopping area. Photograph: Alamy

The Florida Road area north of the centre retains a colonial air, its elegant villas adorned with Victorian lacework balconies, but now there is a great range of restaurants, cafes and bars. Catch a few tunes while sipping cocktails at the Charlatan, try tandoori wraps at Roti & Chai,or wood-fired pizzas at the Firehouse. The southern end in particular buzzes with activity. CityRoast cafe features Vusi, the baritone opera-singing barista, and shares the space with Falafel Fundi, for typical Durban fusion: chicken schnitzel roti anyone? These are cooked by charismatic chef Saar Ben Hamoo and served with great home-made lemonade. Around the corner is the pairing of Ike’s Books and vinyl shop Khaya Records. The bookshop, in a turn-of-the-century building, was an activist meeting place during the apartheid years and has a vast selection of secondhand books on Africa, modern novels and curios. Watch out for the, plus regular book launches and debates. Next door, Khaya Records is not just a record shop but a venue for gigs and events.


Creative district


Momenti Artisan Gelato

Transformed in recent years into a huge venue for shops and artisanal food producers, Station Drive Precinct also has great vintage clothing at the Vintager, furniture, jewellery, the African Art Centre, and pop-up events. Food is a major element: Parkside serves a great potato and chilli frittata, Khuluma make fresh baked goodies and coffee, and Momenti (pictured) does adventurous gelato and sorbets – try the turmeric, or fresh coconut, black sesame and honeycomb. Station 43 is the venue for gigs and food, and even has its own brewery: That Brewing Co.


City tours


Phansi Museum, Durban, South Africa

For an intro to the city, try Justin Perumal’s Wild Routes (prices vary). They are especially strong on arts, from street art and graffiti in Glenwood to the highbrow KZNSA gallery. Another outfit, Beset, does regular free public walks showing visitors the grittier side of the city. Another must-see museum is the Phansi (pictured), whose extraordinary collection of Zulu beadwork, ceramics and crafts is housed in a lovely 19th-century colonial villa in Glenwood that was once the home of Esther Roberts, a campaigner against racial injustice as well as a collector of African arts and crafts. The museum has regular exhibitions and cultural events. Durban Botanic Gardens is an oasis in the city, established in 1849, is Africa’s oldest surviving botanic garden, great for a picnic under the trees or cream scones in its tea garden. It’s also a popular venue for outdoor concerts.


Zulu-style barbecue


A traditional South African bunny chow, Indian curry served in a hollowed out loaf

Bunny chow (half a loaf filled with curry) is Durban’s most famous local speciality: try it at the Britannia Hotel or Cane Cutters in Glenwood. Patels in Yusuf Daddo street does vegetarian bunnies. Less well-known to outsiders is shisa nyama, an informal barbecue where Zulu people celebrate one of the world’s most carnivorous diets. Typically it’s where you go after a night out, to deal with your babalaas – hangover – but evening sessions can mean music and dancing. Much of township life is difficult to access for outsiders, but Max’s Shisa Nyama in Umlazi is a good place to sample it. Run by the Max Mqadi, it has become popular with both locals and tourists. The busy Sunday sessions attract top local DJs.

maxslifestyle.mobi


Beachfront stays


Curiocity backpacker hostel
Curiocity backpacker hostel

For early morning surfing, there is nothing like staying on the beachfront. At boutique backpacker hostel Curiocity (dorm beds £13) the dorms are clean and cheap (there are private rooms, too) and it does film nights, braais and beach yoga. Also handy for the sand is the retro style Blue Waters Hotel (doubles £51 B&B) with fabulous sea views from most rooms. D’Urban Elephant (doubles from £65) is an elegant, six-room Edwardian-era guesthouse on Berea ridge, full of regional art and found objects. Its garden and pool overlook the harbour and ocean, the backdrop for a cooked breakfast on the veranda. Guests can use the kitchen, though the restaurant strip of Glenwood (Helen Joseph Road) is within walking distance.


Markets


Muthi medicine, market, Victoria Street.
Muthi medicine, market, Victoria Street. Photograph: Getty Images

I Heart Market is held on the first Saturday of the month on the lawns outside the Moses Mabhida stadium, the World Cup venue whose arch boasts a panoramic view of the city and ocean. The market has local designers, food and drink stalls, crafts, clothing and a whole lot more. Another great spot is Muthi Market on Victoria Street: muthi is traditional medicine and Durban is home to one of Africa’s largest markets. Despite a serious fire this year, the market is an amazing place to wander around, full of unusual sights, smells and strange juxtapositions. Durban has several other interesting markets, and the best tour is with Markets of Warwick.


Bakeries and cafes


Tasty sandwiches from Glenwood Bakery
Tasty sandwiches from Glenwood Bakery

The Glenwood Bakery is a busy breakfast spot also open in the evenings for pizzas. On the other side of town, Bread the Artisan Bakery in Lilian Ngoyi Road has an interesting range of sourdough. Peter, their baker, is always experimenting with new breads, such as black sage, Egyptian dukka and so on. Antique Café on Churchill Road is exquisitely decorated with Indian saris and antiques. Its courtyard is a lovely spot for breakfast or lunch. The Crazy Korean overlooks the sea just across the Umgeni river, and its irrepressible chef, KJ Lee, has a fantastic selection of Korean food, some cooked at the table. There is a guesthouse attached.


The Chairman


cocktail at the Chairman

A group of young Durban architects have taken a dilapidated building in a rundown part of town and transformed it into something incredible. Huge wooden doors lead to a funky bar area filled with a crazy collection of furniture and artefacts. There’s a popular courtyard out back where customers lounge around on cushions. The cocktail list includes a “voodoo child”, with kiwi fruit and blackcurrant vodka, there’s an extensive whisky menu and they serve great pizza. There’s also an art gallery and live jazz. This is not an area to wander around late at night, but fine by taxi. Another great bar is Lucky Shaker in Umhlanga, north of the city, where a bunch of creative guys make unique cocktails with locally sourced ingredients.

146 Mahatma Gandhi Road, thechairmanlive.com


Catch some music


drumshack durban

The Drumshack hosts weekly community drum jam (£2 entry) at the Castle-on-Main, a 1952-built castle in Hillcrest, 30km west of the city centre, with djembes on sale for those who want to keep drumming after your trip. Also worth catching is the Zakifo music festival in May, a celebration of Indian Ocean music at locations around the city.


Getting there
British Airways starts direct flights from Heathrow to Durban three times a week on October 29, from £599 return.


When to go

Durban has a sub-tropical climate with mild, sunny winters and hot, humid summers (with most rainfall between October and March). The city is the gateway to KwaZulu-Natal, with its many varied attractions, from the Drankensberg mountains in the west to the wetlands of the Elephant Coast in the north-east.


Exchange rate: £1 = 19 South African rand

Dinner for two with wine £23

Beer in a local bar £1.30, coffee £1.50


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010


Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.




A local’s guide to Durban, South Africa: 10 top tipshttps://is.gd/zwhTHn

What is the internet? 13 key questions answered

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-RULzf9jEYoE/W86KgJxOY5I/AAAAAAAAAxg/ouL5DV4JR04iHZ9zX6x7iVWLalI0pHp0ACK4BGAYYCw/s1600/2018-10-23_8-10-22.jpg

What is the internet? 13 key questions answered




Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “What is the internet? 13 key questions answered” was written by Ian Sample, Science editor, for theguardian.com on Monday 22nd October 2018 05.00 UTC


What is the internet?


The internet is the wider network that allows computer networks around the world run by companies, governments, universities and other organisations to talk to one another. The result is a mass of cables, computers, data centres, routers, servers, repeaters, satellites and wifi towers that allows digital information to travel around the world.


It is that infrastructure that lets you order the weekly shop, share your life on Facebook, stream Outcast on Netflix, email your aunt in Wollongong and search the web for the world’s tiniest cat.


How big is the internet?


One measure is the amount of information that courses through it: about five exabytes a day. That’s equivalent to 40,000 two-hour standard definition movies per second.


It takes some wiring up. Hundreds of thousands of miles of cables criss-cross countries, and more are laid along sea floors to connect islands and continents. About 300 submarine cables, the deep-sea variant only as thick as a garden hose, underpin the modern internet. Most are bundles of hair-thin fibre optics that carry data at the speed of light.


image
World wired web Photograph: TeleGeography/www.telegeography.com

The cables range from the 80-mile Dublin to Anglesey connection to the 12,000-mile Asia-America Gateway, which links California to Singapore, Hong Kong and other places in Asia. Major cables serve a staggering number of people. In 2008, damage to two marine cables near the Egyptian port of Alexandria affected tens of millions of internet users in Africa, India, Pakistan and the Middle East.


Last year, the chief of the British defence staff, Sir Stuart Peach, warned that Russia could pose a threat to international commerce and the internet if it chose to destroy marine cables.


How much energy does the internet use?


The Chinese telecoms firm Huawei estimates that the information and communications technology (ICT) industry could use 20% of the world’s electricity and release more than 5% of the world’s carbon emissions by 2025. The study’s author, Anders Andrae, said the coming “tsunami of data was to blame.


In 2016, the US government’s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory estimated that American data centres – facilities where computers store, process and share information – might need 73bn kWh of energy in 2020. That’s the output of 10 Hinkley Point B nuclear power stations.


What is the world wide web?


The web is a way to view and share information over the internet. That information, be it text, music, photos or videos or whatever, is written on web pages served up by a web browser.


Google handles more than 40,000 searches per second, and has 60% of the global browser market through Chrome. There are nearly 2bn websites in existence but most are hardly visited. The top 0.1% of websites (roughly 5m) attract more than half of the world’s web traffic.


Among them are Google, YouTube, Facebook, the Chinese site Baidu, Instagram, Yahoo, Twitter, the Russian social network VK.com, Wikipedia, Amazon and a smattering of porn sites. The rise of apps means that for many people, being on the internet today is less about browsing the open web than getting more focused information: news, messages, weather forecasts, videos and the like.


What is the dark web?


A search of the web does not search all of it. Google the word “puppies” and your browser will display web pages the search engine has found in the hundreds of billions that has logged in its search index. While the search index is massive, it contains only a fraction of what is on the web.


xxx

Far more, perhaps 95%, is unindexed and so invisible to standard browsers. Think of the web as having three layers: surface, deep and dark. Standard web browsers trawl the surface web, the pages that are most visible. Under the surface is the deep web: a mass of pages that are not indexed. These include pages held behind passwords – the kind found on the office intranet, for example, and pages no one links to, since Google and others build their search indexes by following links from one web page to another.


Buried in the deep web is the dark web, a bunch of sites with addresses that hide them from view. To access the dark web, you need special software such as Tor (The Onion Router), a tool originally created by the US navy for intelligence agents online. While the dark web has plenty of legitimate uses, not least to preserve the anonymity of journalists, activists and whistleblowers, a substantial portion is driven by criminal activity. Illicit marketplaces on the dark web trade everything from drugs, guns and counterfeit money to hackers, hitmen and child pornography.


How many people are online?


It depends how you measure it. One metric popular with the International Telecommunications Union (ITU), a UN body, counts being online as having used the internet in the past three months.


It means people are not assumed to use the internet simply because they live in a town with an internet cable or near a wifi tower. By this yardstick, some 3.58 billion people, or 48% of the global population, were online by the end of 2017. The number should reach 3.8 billion, or 49.2%, by the end of 2018, with half of the world being online by May 2019.


Fixed-line internet connections are expensive in developing countries, so most people connect through their mobile phones. The trend leads to a two-tier experience of the internet that is hidden by growth figures. What can be done on a mobile phone is a fraction of what can be achieved with a desktop, laptop or tablet, as anyone who has tried to file their tax return on their mobile will know.


“The distinction often gets lost in the discussion around access and affordability,” says Dhanaraj Thakur, research director at the Web Foundation. “We can say that 50% of the world is using the internet, but the majority are using it on their phones. In terms of productivity, that is completely different to using a desktop or laptop.”


Chart

The popularity of mobile internet leads to other issues too. In Africa, for example, the telcos incentivise people to buy 20MB to 1GB data bundles by offering access to key apps such as Facebook, WhatsApp, Instagram, Gmail and Twitter, even when they run out of data. The upshot is that people associate the internet with those platforms rather than the open web. Some even fail to realise they are using the internet.


The issue came to light when surveys and focus groups in Africa and southeast Asia found that more people said they used Facebook than went online. “For them Facebook is the internet. They are not exploring beyond it,” said Nanjira Sambuli, who leads the Web Foundation’s efforts to promote equality in access to the web.


Who are they?


In some countries nearly everyone is online. More than 98% of Icelanders are on the internet, with similar percentages in Denmark, Norway, Luxembourg and Bahrain, the ITU says. In Britain about 95% are online, compared with 85% in Spain, 84% in Germany, 80% in France and only 64% in Italy.


Meanwhile, a 2018 report from the Pew Research Center found that 89% of Americans are online. The unconnected tend to be poorer, older, less educated and rural. The west does not dominate the online world, though. While the US has around 300 million internet users, China notched up more than 800 million in 2018, with 40% of its population still unconnected. India reached an estimated 500 million internet users this year, with 60% of the nation still offline.


What are they doing?


A minute on the internet looks like this: 156m emails, 29m messages, 1.5m Spotify songs, 4m Google searches, 2m minutes of Skype calls, 350,000 tweets, 243,000 photos posted on Facebook, 87,000 hours of Netflix, 65,000 pictures put on Instagram, 25,000 posts on Tumblr, 18,000 matches on Tinder, and 400 hours of video uploaded to YouTube.


Most consumer internet traffic is video: add up all the online video watched on websites, YouTube, Netflix and webcams and you have 77% of the world’s internet traffic, according to US tech firm Cisco.


What places are offline?


There is a stark divide between the haves and have-nots and poverty is an overwhelming factor. In the urban centres of some African nations, internet access is routine.


More than half of South Africans and Moroccans are online, and parts of other countries, such as Botswana, Cameroon and Gabon, are connecting fast. Mobile phones are driving growth thanks to mobile broadband costs falling 50% in the past three years.


But plenty of places are not keeping pace. In Tanzania, Uganda and Sudan, around 30 to 40% can get online. In Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone only 7 to 11% are online.


Chart

In Eritrea and Somalia, less than 2% have access. To build a mobile hotspot in a remote, off-grid village can cost three times the urban equivalent, which reaches far more people and so brings a much greater return on investment. In rural communities, there is often little demand for the internet because people do not see the point: the web does not serve their interests.


Are certain groups offline?


Chart

There is a clear age divide: far fewer older people use the internet than younger people. In Britain, where 99% of 16- to 34-year-olds are online, the 75-and-overs make up more than half of the 4.5 million adults who have never used the internet, according to the Office of National Statistics.


There is a serious gender gap too. In two-thirds of the world’s nations, men dominate internet usage. Globally, there are 12% fewer women online than men. While the digital gender gap has narrowed in most regions since 2013, it has widened in Africa. There, 25% fewer women than men use the internet, the ITU says.


Meanwhile, in Pakistan, men outnumber women online by nearly two-to-one, while in India, 70% of internet users are men. The divide largely reflects patriarchal traditions and the inequalities they instil.


Some countries buck the trend, notably Jamaica, where more women than men are online. This may be because more women than men enrol at the University of the West Indies in Kingston. The country has the highest proportion of female managers in the world.


How will the whole world get online?


A major challenge is to get affordable internet to poor, rural regions. With an eye on expanding markets, US tech firms hope to make inroads. Google’s parent company, Alphabet, scrapped plans for solar powered drones and is now focusing on high-altitude balloons to provide the internet from the edge of space. Elon Musk’s SpaceX and a company called OneWeb have their own plans to bring internet access to everyone in the world via constellations of microsatellites.


Facebook, which saw its Free Basics service banned under India’s net neutrality laws, has also abandoned plans for internet-beaming drones and is now working with local companies to provide affordable mobile services.


Microsoft, meanwhile, is using TV white spaces – the unused broadcast frequencies – for wireless broadband. Another approach, community networks, is also gaining ground. These mobile networks typically use solar-powered stations and are built by and for local communities. Run by cooperatives, they are cheaper than the alternatives and keep skills and profits in the area.


xxx

Further reading


Weaving the Web: The Original Design and Ultimate Destiny of the World Wide Web, Tim Berners-Lee


The Future of the Internet and How to Stop It, by Jonathan Zittrain


Googled: The End of the World As We Know It, Ken Auletta


You Are Not a Gadget, Jaron Lanier


Republic.com, Cass Sunstein


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010


Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.




What is the internet? 13 key questions answeredhttps://is.gd/dKw3I9

Google Home Hub review: the smart display to buy

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-C7O4sJOKfSw/W85_kPD_FqI/AAAAAAAAAwM/Cz-mUdVczIQLouYTS77DdM34uENB4a8PwCK4BGAYYCw/s1600/2018-10-23_7-23-29.jpg

Google Home Hub review: the smart display to buy




Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “Google Home Hub review: the smart display to buy” was written by Samuel Gibbs, for theguardian.com on Monday 22nd October 2018 11.00 UTC


The Home Hub is Google’s first own-brand smart display, combining Google Assistant, advanced smart-home control and a digital photo frame into a neat and tidy package.


Google isn’t the first to market with smart displays. Amazon’s Echo Show put the company’s Alexa on a screen a year ago, while Google Assistant smart displays made by Harman, Lenovo and LG were released a few months ago.


But Google’s Home Hub is slightly different. Firstly, it doesn’t have a camera on it, which Google goes to great lengths to repeatedly tell you in the hope you will find it less creepy and feel more comfortable putting it in places like your bedroom. It still has a pair of microphones, of course.


The second is that it’s a lot smaller than the competition, designed to blend in rather than be a statement piece in your house.


What is it?


Google Home Hub review
The Google Home Hub flanked by the Google Home on the left and Google Home Mini on the right. Photograph: Samuel Gibbs for the Guardian

At its most basic, the Home Hub is a 7in digital photo frame with Google Assistant built in. It works just like any other Google Home, Mini or Max, answering your questions, playing music and controlling smart-home devices, but with the added twist of visual information displayed on the touchscreen.


The screen is the best I’ve seen on a smart display thus far, being brighter, crisper and clearer than the first-generation of Amazon’s Echo Show, for instance. It’s got an ambient light sensor that, like Apple’s iPhone XS and iPad Pro line, tweaks the brightness and colour of the display to provide consistently good-looking images on screen adjusting to the light in the room.


The Ambient EQ system makes your photos look realistic in colour in varying lighting conditions, but it was a bit dim in low-level lighting for my liking. You can boost or reduce the brightness by a couple of notches in the Google Home app, but changing the brightness on Home Hub itself disables Ambient EQ. Swipe up from the bottom to access manual brightness and volume controls.


The home screen can display a choice of clock faces, images or photos from your Google Photos library. You can also ask for photos via voice, such as pictures from Portland or King’s Cross, or of people you’ve tagged in your image library. It all works very well.


When resting, the Home Hub can also display the primary user’s calendar, the weather, news stories and content from apps such as Spotify playlists, which you can swipe through with your finger and jump straight to an activity.


Question answering machine


Google Home Hub review
Weather reports are accompanied by sound effects such as birds tweeting for sunny days and rain for typical British weather. Photograph: Samuel Gibbs for the Guardian

Google Assistant is by far the most capable of the virtual assistants at understanding and answering questions, and can hear you just as well on the smart display as Google’s Home smart speakers. Mess up a query or command and nine times out of 10 you’ll still get the right result, which can’t be said for Alexa, Microsoft’s Cortana or Apple’s Siri.


On the Home Hub answers are accompanied by visual information, such as the hourly or daily weather forecast or a photo of Jeff Goldblum as it explains he is 65 years old.


Many of these information cards are also interactive. Asking how to get to somewhere displays a map into which you can zoom with your fingers on the touchscreen. Using Google’s Voice Match recognition system the Home Hub can identify who is asking a question or giving a command and provide personalised answers. Ask for how your commute looks and it gives you your commute, not another member of your household’s. The same goes for music libraries and calendars.


Google Assistant will also ping the phone of the person who asked the question with more information for navigation options and other queries that would he helpful to look into more detail or take with you.


Recipes are really good on the Home Hub. Ask how to make beef bourguignon and the screen will display a selection of recipes from the web. Selecting one shows you the recipe, from which you can tap to start cooking and get step-by-step instructions read out and displayed on screen one at a time. Progress through the recipe by tapping or asking for the next step, or jump back one to view the whole thing. It’s well designed and easy to use.


‘Hey Google, good morning’


Google Home Hub review
Timers, alarms and all the usual smart assistant tools are there. Photograph: Samuel Gibbs for the Guardian

Google Assistant has a bunch of routines you can trigger with voice commands. By default saying “good morning” will show the weather, your commute, what’s on your calendar and show any reminders, then it’ll play your choice of news sources, music, radio, podcasts or audiobook. It can even switch on lights and other smart home devices.


You can set up routines to do lots of different things and tie them to your own custom phrases. You need to invest a bit of time to figure out what you want to do, but it’s a really powerful system worth trying out.


Smart home control


Google Home Hub review
Swipe down from the top of the display to show the smart home panel, or tap view rooms to show the complete smart home control dashboard. Photograph: Samuel Gibbs for the Guardian

Having started slowly with third-party smart home device integration, Google can now control almost any smart home device, from lights, to cameras, thermostats and even locks, with notable exceptions being Amazon’s Ring and Sonos speakers.


Recently Google turned its Home app into a one-stop-shop for controlling connected devices. The Home Hub takes that easy all-in-one control station to the next level.


Swipe down from the top to reveal a panel with all your Google Assistant connected smart home devices. From there you can turn on lights and adjust their brightness and colours, see cameras, adjust the temperature or do anything else from an easy to use command and control screen. There’s even a button to turn it all off, right from the screen.


Expensive, custom installation smart homes have had this kind of touchscreen dashboard system for a while, but it’s been difficult to achieve with off-the-shelf kit until now. Voice control is great, but when you’re trying to do lots of things at once and see the status of devices, touchscreen buttons are better.


Restrictions


Google Home Hub review
YouTube works great via voice or the touchscreen. Photograph: Samuel Gibbs for the Guardian

Google’s recent push into digital wellbeing extends to the Home Hub. You can set scheduled downtime blocking responses from Assistant as well as music and video on the display, while leaving alarms and timers accessible.


Filters can also restrict YouTube to certain content, such as that included in YouTube Kids, or block it entirely. They can also block explicit music tracks or all music, block voice calls, restrict Assistant’s answers to basic things like the weather and block third-party app actions except for those specifically designed for families.


These filters can be applied wholesale on the device or only for supervised accounts or guests, so if you don’t want your kids watching YouTube you can block access to it.


Sound quality


The Home Hub sounds somewhere between the Google Home and the Home Mini for music. It can get pretty loud and clear, but lacks any real bass and sounds pretty shrill at 100% volume, meaning this isn’t a smart speaker to buy for rocking out.


It does a great job of rendering the Assistant’s voice, and works perfectly well for watching YouTube videos and news broadcasts. But it doesn’t really compare to the audio you get from Amazon’s first-generation Echo Show.


Observations


  • The screen can be set to turn off or go very dim in darkness

  • Swipe from the left edge to go back one screen

  • Some answers are accompanied by sound effects, such as birds tweeting for sunny weather predictions

  • Manual tweaking of brightness, low-light mode and display settings are buried in a menu on the Google Home app

  • There’s a night mode you can schedule to reduce the volume of responses and block notifications apart from alarms and timers

  • You can use it as a Bluetooth speaker

  • The Home Hub can show you the video from any linked smart cameras

Price


The Google Home Hub costs £139 and is available in grey, black, turquoise or pink.


For comparison, Amazon’s second generation Echo Show costs £220, the Harman JBL Link View costs £249 and the Lenovo Smart Display starts at £160. Google’s screen-less Home costs £129, Home Mini costs £49 and the Home Max costs £399.


Verdict


The Google Home Hub is arguably the best smart display on the market. It’s much smaller than you might expect, with a really good-looking 7in screen that appears to be mounted into a small fabric cushion that’s only visible at the bottom.


It’s a simple, understated design that blends in well with furnishings, and would be as at home on a book case or mantle piece as on a table or work surface side. The lack of a camera is probably a plus point for those, like me, who will never video call anyone, and you can still do things on the touchscreen with the mic muted.


Recipes are particularly good on the Home Hub, while the added one-touch smart home control, status and camera display is brilliant. It’s not a great music speaker for the money though and the fabric surface is going to be more difficult to keep clean in a kitchen.


But the Home Hub is cheaper than most of the competition and gets much more than just the basics right. If you swim in Google’s ecosystem, this is the smart display for you.


Pros: great touchscreen, minimalist design, Bluetooth, Google Assistant, can hear you well, excellent smart home control, great recipes, cheaper than the competition


Cons: no 3.5mm socket, fabric could get dirty in a kitchen, need to dig into the Google Home app to change almost any setting, only Google services


Google Home Hub review
The back of the Google Home Hub has the volume buttons, mute switch and just a traditional power socket. Photograph: Samuel Gibbs for the Guardian

Other reviews


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010


Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.




Google Home Hub review: the smart display to buyhttps://is.gd/RFwORb

More

Whats Hot